Cases 51 - 60 of 142
Brooks v. Harris County Jail et al
as 4:2020cv02112
Defendant:
District Court, Harris County Jail and Kim Ogg
Plaintiff:
Gregory Wade Brooks, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sosa v. Ogg
as 4:2020cv01984
Defendant:
District Attorney Kim Ogg
Plaintiff:
Thomas Coleman Sosa, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Farshid v. Ogg et al
as 4:2020cv01932
Plaintiff:
Steven Farshid
Defendant:
Amir Mireskandari, Kim Ogg, Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888
KHC LLC et al v. Ogg et al
as 4:2020cv01923
Plaintiff:
William Heuer III, Alan Chodrow, Daniel J Kebort and others
Defendant:
Greg Travis, Tim Wilson, Sr, Ali Davoudi and others
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888
Jones v. Gonzales et al
as 4:2020cv01864
Plaintiff:
Jammie L. Jones
Defendant:
Ed Gonzales and Kim Ogg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sosa v. Ogg
as 4:2020cv01786
Defendant:
District Attorney Kim Ogg
Plaintiff:
Thomas Coleman Sosa, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Planned Parenthood Center for Choice et al v. Abbott et al
as 1:2020cv00323
Plaintiff:
Whole Woman's Health Alliance, Planned Parenthood Center for Choice, Planned Parenthood South Texas Surgical Center and others
Defendant:
Jaime Esparza, Joe Gonzales, Margaret Moore and others
Amicus Curiae:
The State of Louisiana and 15 States
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clinton Ards v. Robert Johnson, et al
as 20-20114
Defendant / Appellee:
C. IRVING, Irving Law Firm, WARDEN CROWLEY, Holiday Unit, P. THIELKE, Parole Department Austin, Texas and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CLINTON L. ARDS
Richie v. Capone
as 4:2020cv00503
Respondent:
Robert Wiloff, Bradley Steven Hart, Randi P. Capone and others
Petitioner:
Antone Riche
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ards v. Johnson et al
as 4:2020cv00357
Defendant:
Warden Crowley, D.A. Kim Ogg, Warden J Gauna and others
Plaintiff:
Clinton L Ards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
