Cases
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv01483
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Chao v. Rhode Island Housing Mortgage and Finance Corporation
as 1:2012cv00841
Plaintiff: Kim Sang Chao
Defendant: Rhode Island Housing Mortgage and Finance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Daniel Stevens v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 11-3707
Petitioner: DANIEL GORDON STEVENS, aka Kim Stevens, aka Daniel Gordon, aka Kim Sang Chul
Respondent: ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General
Chankook Chun et al v. Republic of Korea et al
as 2:2011cv04972
Plaintiff: Chankook Chun and Jachyung Geon
Defendant: Department of Defense, Kwon Do-Youp, Robert M Gates and others
The: United States Army
Daniel Stevens v. Steven Branch
as 11-80011
Petitioner: DANIEL GORDON STEVENS, AKA Kim Sang Chui
Respondent: STEVEN L. BRANCH, Field Office Director, Immigration & Customs Enforcement
Seoul Broadcasting System International, Inc. et al v. Sang et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv01645
Plaintiff: Seoul Broadcasting System International, Inc., Seoul Broadcasting System International, Inc., Mun Hwa Broadcasting Corporation and others
Defendant: John Kim Sang, Hwa Sook Kim, Jong Sook Kim and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Hwang, Geum Joo, et al v. Japan We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 01-7169
Plaintiff - Appellant: Geum Joo Hwang, Yuan Zhulin, Lola Tomasa Salinog and others
Defendant - Appellee: Japan, Minister Yohei Kono, Minister of Foreign Affairs
Amicus Curiae For Appellant: Washington Coalition for Comfort Women Issues, Inc., New York Coalition on Comfort Women Issues, Kelly Askin, Professor and others
Amicus Curiae For Appellee: United States of America

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?