Cases 41 - 50 of 58
TABANSI v. SCI FOREST J-BLOCK RHU ET AL et al
as 1:2015cv00261
Plaintiff:
SEHU KESSA SAA TABANSI
Defendant:
SCI FOREST J-BLOCK RHU ET AL, MICHAEL D. OVERMYER, JEFFREY HORTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BLACK v. SMITH et al
as 1:2015cv00254
Plaintiff:
RYAN BLACK
Defendant:
KIM SMITH and HEATHER G. MCKEEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mack v. Garman et al
as 3:2015cv01446
Plaintiff:
Steven Mack
Defendant:
Mark Garman, Steven Glunt, Marirosa Lamas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Forrest v. Overmeyer et al
as 3:2014cv00934
Plaintiff:
Michael Forrest
Defendant:
Michael Overmeyer, Michael Tice, Lt. Murin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SIMS v. WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES et al
as 1:2014cv00108
Plaintiff:
LORENZO SIMS
Defendant:
WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, CORIZON INC., NANCY FLYNN MCGARVIE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
JAMES v. SAUERS et al
as 1:2014cv00069
Plaintiff:
PARIS L. JAMES
Defendant:
DEBRA SAUERS, ERIC TICE, MICHAEL OVERMYER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
WRIGHT v. SAUERS et al
as 1:2014cv00021
Plaintiff:
JAMES OSCAR WRIGHT
Defendant:
DEBRA SAUERS, MICHEAL OVERMYER, ERIC TICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WRIGHT v. SAUERS et al
as 1:2013cv00358
Plaintiff:
JAMES OSCAR WRIGHT
Defendant:
DEBRA SAUERS, MICHEAL OVERMYER, ERIC TICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
BREELAND v. WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES et al
as 1:2013cv00310
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH BREELAND
Defendant:
WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, NANCY MCGARVIE, RHONDA SHERBINE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
TINDELL v. WETZEL et al
as 1:2013cv00182
Plaintiff:
ARCHIE TINDELL
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL , JAMES BARNAGEL , DANIEL BURNS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
