Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Cornille v. Myers et al
as 3:2024cv01202
Defendant:
Administrative Review Board, William Loy, Percy Myers and others
Plaintiff:
Bradley J Cornille, Sr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Berger v. Hughes et al
as 3:2024cv03028
Plaintiff:
Christian Berger
Defendant:
Latoya Hughes, Wexford Health Sources Inc, Vernon Dewitt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Dixon Correctional Center et al
as 3:2024cv50044
Plaintiff:
Dorenzo Moore
Defendant:
Dixon Correctional Center, Tarry Williams, Kim Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Williams
as 3:2023cv50248
Plaintiff:
Dorenzo Moore and Devante Hill
Defendant:
Dixon Correctional Center, J. B. Pritzker, Rob Jeffreys and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Hasemyer et al
as 3:2022cv01384
Plaintiff:
Jeramey R Brown
Defendant:
Chad Hasemyer, Jessica Huffman, Anthony Wills and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clervrain et al v. Jeffreys et al
as 3:2022cv00571
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain, Fridelyne Maisoneuve, Roselaine Clerval and others
Defendant:
Rob Jeffreys, Shelith Hansbro, Michael R. Lane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kodatt v. Pritzker et al
as 3:2019cv03252
Defendant:
. Waynescott, . Pierce, J B Pritzker and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Kodatt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nejmanowski v. Pritzker et al
as 3:2019cv03185
Defendant:
Kim Smith, . Pierce, IDOC A.R.B. and others
Plaintiff:
Justin Nejmanowski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crenshaw v. Smith
as 3:2019cv03008
Undetermined:
Habeas Attorney General
Respondent:
Kim Smith
Petitioner:
Michael E Crenshaw
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jenkins v. Smith et al
as 1:2018cv06696
Respondent:
Kimberly Smith and Kim Smith
Petitioner:
Ernest R Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
