Cases 1 - 10 of 503
Thomas Brennan v. Kim Thomas, et al
as 18-12309
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS G. BRENNAN
Defendant - Appellee:
KIM TOBIAS THOMAS, CARTER F. DAVENPORT, JOSEPH H. HEADLEY and others
Smith v. Myers et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2016cv00919
Plaintiff:
Melvin Smith
Defendant:
Walter Myers, Carter Davenport, Jefferson S. Dunn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vanessa Gill v. Bobby Barrett, et al
as 16-15642
Petitioner - Appellant:
VANESSA GILL
Respondent - Appellee:
BOBBY BARRETT, KIM TOBIAS THOMAS and ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF ALABAMA
George Presley v. LaTonya Scott, et al
as 16-11780
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GEORGE WALTER PRESLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
LATONYA SCOTT, Lt., CARL SANDERS, Captain, KIM TOBIAS THOMAS, Commissioner and others
Moore v. Corizon Medical Services et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2016cv00013
Plaintiff:
Thurmon E. Moore, II
Defendant:
Corizon Medical Services , H. Hood , Doctor Stone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackie Collins v. Alabama Prison Commissioner, et al
as 15-14495
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JACKIE COLLINS
Defendant - Appellee:
KIM TOBIAS THOMAS and CAROLYN GOLSON
Traywick v. Thomas et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2015cv00372
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Shaun Traywick
Defendant:
Kim Tobias Thomas, Woodrow A. Myers, Jr. , Dr. Crocker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henderson v. Bowen et al
as 1:2015cv00280
Plaintiff:
Solomon L. Henderson
Defendant:
Billy Bowen, David Martinez, Life Tech and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Desiney Carter v. Peasant, et al
as 15-12277
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DESINEY DEON CARTER
Defendant - Appellee:
PEASANT, KIM TOBIAS THOMAS, STATE OF ALABAMA and others
Hickman v. Jones et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2015cv00352
Plaintiff:
Edward Philpot Hickman
Defendant:
Karla Jones, Luther Strange, Kim Tobias Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
