Cases 1 - 10 of 1,520
Geary v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00413
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Geary
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Hanson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00414
Plaintiff:
Kimberly D. Hanson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Crespo v. Carvajal
as 24-1138
Plaintiff:
DAVID CRESPO, ANTHONY PODIAS, PEDRO ESPADA, JR. and others
Intervenor:
CHENSHIN CHAN and DAVID NAGY
Defendant:
MICHAEL CARVAJAL, Northeast Regional Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons, WARDEN HERMAN QUAY, III, Former Warden, MDC Brooklyn, KIMBERLY ASK-CARLSON, Former Warden, MDC Brooklyn and others
Cruz v. Board of Elections in the City of New Yok et al
as 1:2024cv03153
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Cruz
Defendant:
Board of Elections in the City of New Yok, The City of New York, Karen Koslowithzz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03005
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Guarracino v. Kimberly-Clark Corporation
as 7:2024cv03074
Plaintiff:
DEBRA GUARRACINO
Defendant:
Kimberly-Clark Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pl Diversity-Product Liability
Gallatin v. McGrath RentCorp et al
as 1:2024cv02960
Plaintiff:
David Gallatin
Defendant:
McGrath RentCorp, Joseph F. Hanna, Nicolas C. Anderson and others
Maita-Tenemaza v. Garland
as 24-1020
Petitioner:
EDWIN ANTONIO MAITA-TENEMAZA, KIMBERLY ALEXANDRA MAITA-MOROCHO and CARMEN CLAUDINA MOROCHO-CALI
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
McFadden v. USA
as 3:2024cv00707
Plaintiff:
Kimberly A McFadden
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
