Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Mark Daviscourt v. Gwannette Claybrook, et al
as 23-35397
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARK DAVISCOURT
Defendant / Appellee:
GWANNETTE M. CLAYBROOK, Acting Director, IRS Western Area Collection, STEVE BAKER, IRS Revenue Officer, PATRICIA L. DAVIS, IRS Appeals Advisor and others
Mark Daviscourt v. Gwannette Claybrook, et al
as 19-35873
Defendant / Appellee:
AS YET UNKNOWN ASSISTANT U.S. ATTORNEYS, T. B. JONES, (COIC) Group Manager, BRYAN STEBBINS, Southwest Washington Representative, Office of U.S. Senator Patty Murray and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARK DAVISCOURT
Daviscourt v. Claybrook et al
as 2:2018cv01148
Defendant:
As Yet Unknown Special Agents, Agents, Officers and Officials of the Office of the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration, As Yet Unknown Agents, Officers and Officials of the Office of General Counsel for the U S Department of Treasury, Yael Bortnick and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Daviscourt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1986
Gilbert Salinas v. Kimberly Lewis et al
as 8:2017cv01303
Defendant:
Jan Lauren Calmer, Jan Lauren Calmer, Wade Corley Calmer and others
Plaintiff:
Gilbert Salinas
Kimberly Lewis v. The Kroger Co. et al
as 5:2015cv01515
Defendant:
Does, Riverside Creamery and The Kroger Co.
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Lewis
Kimberly Lewis v. The Kroger Co. et al
as 2:2015cv05683
Defendant:
Does, Riverside Creamery and The Kroger Co.
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Lewis
Bank of America National Association v. Kimberly Lewis-Bias et al
as 2:2010cv03368
Counter Defendant:
Bank of America National Association
Plaintiff:
Bank of America National Association
Defendant:
Does and Kimberly Lewis-Bias
Counter Claimant:
Kimberly Lewis-Bias
Wallace v. Lewis et al
as 3:2007cv01743
Plaintiff:
Henry Lee Wallace
Defendant:
Kimberly Lewis, Psychological Department, Prison Industrial Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
