Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Morris et al v. Sugarman et al
as 1:2023cv09327
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Morris, Alger Jason Ryan Morris, James Baker and others
Defendant:
Kenneth Dean Sugarman, Bank of America, N.A. and John and Jane Does 1-25
3Rd Party Defendant:
Atlanta Legal Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 t Diversity-Torts
Alcoser v. Ford
as 21-50626
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Danny Wayne Alcoser
Defendant / Appellee:
Kathryne Ford, Child Protective Services Specialist, Joshua Parson, Child Protective Services Investigator, Kimberly Morris, Attorney General of Texas and others
Morris v. Sanofi US Services, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv00852
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Morris
Defendant:
Actavis LLC f/k/a Actavis Inc., Hospira, Inc., Pfizer Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Morris v. National Church Residences et al
as 1:2020cv00505
Defendant:
National Church Residences and Commons AT Imperial Hotel
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Morris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Morris v. State of GA
as 1:2020cv00507
Defendant:
State of GA
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Morris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morris v. Williams
as 1:2020cv00471
Defendant:
Andrea Blaze Williams
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Morris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morris v. Howard
as 1:2020cv00469
Defendant:
Paul L. Howard, Jr.
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Morris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morris v. Metro Fair Housing
as 1:2020cv00472
Defendant:
Metro Fair Housing
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Morris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morris v. Hillenden
as 1:2020cv00473
Defendant:
Shukura I. Hillenden
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Morris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Danny Alcoser v. Kathryne Ford, et al
as 19-50759
Defendant / Appellee:
JUDGE PHILLIP ARRIENS, Judge of the 4D Court, KATHRYNE FORD, Child Protective Services Specialist, JUDGE GARY COLEY, JR., Juvenile Judge for the 4th District Court and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANNY WAYNE ALCOSER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
