Cases 1 - 10 of 308
McCray v. Stirling et al
as 9:2024cv01638
Plaintiff:
James Roosevelt McCray
Defendant:
Cpt. Bryan P. Stirling, Cpt. B Bibbs, Lt. Coata Kimbrell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Victoria v. Kimbrell et al
as 5:2024cv01441
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lamar Victoria
Defendant:
Coata Kimbrell, John Palmer, Willie Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Jimmy Causey v. Charles Williams
as 24-6198
Plaintiff:
JIMMY H. CAUSEY
Defendant:
CHARLES WILLIAMS, MS. DAVIS, MS. CLOUD and others
Goodwin v. McCormick Correctional Institution
as 1:2024cv01065
Plaintiff:
Antonio Goodwin
Defendant:
McCormick Correctional Institution, John Palmer, Byron Bibbs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Stanley v. Palmer et al
as 5:2024cv00788
Plaintiff:
Samuri Stanley
Defendant:
Warden John Palmer, EHSO John Doe, Captain Bibbs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Muqit v. ofc Rivera et al
as 0:2024cv00720
Plaintiff:
Yahya Muqit
Defendant:
ofc Rivera, Sgt Salazor, Sgt. Kimbrell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Pryor v. Palmer et al
as 1:2024cv00048
Plaintiff:
Lakendrick D. Pryor
Defendant:
Warden John L. Palmer, Cpt. Byron Bipps, EHSO John or Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Pryor v. Kimbrell
as 1:2023cv06157
Plaintiff:
Lakendrick Pryor
Defendant:
Lt. Kimbrell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Tynes v. McCormick Correctional Institution et al
as 8:2023cv05887
Plaintiff:
Mario Tynes
Defendant:
McCormick Correctional Institution, FNU Palmer, A. W. Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-13604
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
