Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Ewing v. Kirtz Investments, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00986
Plaintiff:
Anton A. Ewing
Defendant:
Kirtz Investments, Inc. and Sean Richard Kirtz
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227 FCC-Unsolicited Telephone Sales
KIRTZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv68121
Plaintiff:
DEVIN KIRTZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Reginald Kirtz v. Trans Union LLC, et al
as 21-2149
Defendant / Appellee:
PENNSYLVANIA HIGHER EDUCATION ASSISTANCE AGENCY, DBA American Education Services, TRANS UNION LLC and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE RURAL DEVELOPMENT RURAL HOUSING SERVICE
Plaintiff / Appellant:
REGINALD KIRTZ
Reginald Kirtz v. Trans Union LLC, et al
as 21-8034
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE RURAL DEVELOPMENT RURAL HOUSING SERVICE, TRANS UNION LLC and PENNSYLVANIA HIGHER EDUCATION ASSISTANCE AGENCY, d/b/a AMERICAN EDUCATION SERVICES
Petitioner:
REGINALD KIRTZ
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv05231
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
KIRTZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv51079
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DEMARIUS KIRTZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Donald Roots v. Robert Fox, et al
as 19-16991
Defendant / Appellee:
TIMOTHY M. FRAWLEY, Judge, JAN SCULLY, Prosecutory DA, CHU, Correctional Officer and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DONALD ROOTS
James Briks, et al v. Karl Yeager, et al
as 19-2093
Defendant / Appellee:
Jane Does, I through X, Karl J. Yeager, an individual, John Does, I through X and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jerome Briks, an individual and James Briks, an individual
(PC) Roots v. Fox et al
as 2:2018cv02458
Defendant:
Trina Burger Plaven, Gary Lutz, Classification and others
Plaintiff:
Donald Roots
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
