Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Knight v. Detroit, City of et al
as 4:2023cv10295
Plaintiff:
Tyrese Davon Knight
Defendant:
City of Detroit, Detroit Police Department, Otis J. Funches and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00792
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disability Act for Handicappers
Knight v. City of Detroit et al
as 2:2022cv11677
Plaintiff:
James Knight
Defendant:
City of Detroit, Herman King, Deputy John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Knight v. City of Detroit et al
as 2:2022cv11678
Plaintiff:
James Knight
Defendant:
City of Detroit, Herman King, JOHN DOE 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Mathis v. United States Attorney General et al
as 1:2020cv00867
Defendant:
AT&T, Knights of Columbus, United States Marshal Service and others
Plaintiff:
Evonna Mathis and RESTRICTED FILER Evonna Mathis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mathis v. Dept. of Justice Center et al
as 1:2020cv00837
Defendant:
Dept. of Justice Center, AT&T, Knights of Columbus and others
Plaintiff:
Evonna Mathis and RESTRICTED FILER Evonna Mathis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Knight v. Trotter
as 2:2020cv10574
Defendant:
Rodney Trotter
Plaintiff:
Anthony Knight
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv12437
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01031
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00964
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
