Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Kohler v. Oregon Dept. of Corrections et al
as 6:2021cv01246
Plaintiff:
Richard Charles Kohler
Defendant:
Oregon Dept. of Corrections, Corporal Hannon and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Underwood v. 1450 SE Orient, LLC et al
as 3:2018cv01366
Defendant:
Denise K. Concannon, Michael R. Munzing, Aligra Marie Rainy and others
Plaintiff:
Laura L. Underwood
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Dickman v. Kohler et al
as 6:2017cv00820
Defendant:
Mike Baker, Jeff Cooley, Douglas Multi-Family Property Management Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Frank Karl Dickman, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Kohler v. City of Eugene et al
as 6:2014cv01879
Defendant:
City of Eugene, Eugene Police Department, Peter Kerns and others
Plaintiff:
Kashon Nathaniel Kohler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Oregon Bureau of Labor and Industries v. Housing Authority of Douglas County et al
as 6:2013cv01205
Defendant:
Housing Authority of Douglas County, Tonya Iannuzzo, Janeal Kohler and others
Plaintiff:
Oregon Bureau of Labor and Industries
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Kohler v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 6:2012cv01683
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Daniel Isaac Kohler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 g Review of Commissioner's Final Decision
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv01441
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157 Motion for Withdrawal of Reference
Ann Sacks Tile & Stone, Inc. et al v. Wilmoth
as 3:2011mc09202
Appellant:
Ann Sacks Tile & Stone, Inc. and Kohler Co.
Appellee:
Stephanie Wilmoth
Williams v. Sears, Roebuck and Co. et al
as 3:2009cv00020
Plaintiff:
David M. Williams
Defendant:
Sears, Roebuck and Co., Deere & Company, Tecumseh Products Company and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
