Cases
Kastner v. Tri State Eye
as 20-3671
Plaintiff / Appellant: Joseph R.E. Kastner
Defendant: Third Party CIGNA, United States of America, All Represented by the US Attorney through the US Food & Drug Administration, USA et al. through the EEOC, through the "SSAUSA" et al.The US Inspector General,USA et al., United States Department of Health and Human Services and others
Defendant / Appellee: Tri State Eye, et al., Crystal Run Healthcare, Coverys RFG, Inc., is serviced by ProSelect Insurance Company, CRHC REP #1 Mr. Douglas Sansted(Esq. Not LLP) CRHC Rep. #2 Kristen Larson Doyle(Esq Not LLP) Jeffrey Feldman Doyle(Esq not LLP) are all reps of FKC&S CRHC exclusiv, Feldman, Kleidman, Coffey & Sappe, Attorneys at Law FKC&S Rep #1 Kristen Larsen Doyle (Esq Not LLP) are all Reps of FKC&S CRHC Exclusively Esqs. and others
Plaintiff: Jane and John Doe 1-20, Personal Injury / Pain Suffering, Emotional Physical Psychological Distress Litigation, and Lost Income of 32 Years Past, Present and Future, Civil Rights, Medical Malpractice, Personal Injury, Civil Rights with High Prejudice
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-2034
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2016cv00910
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2016cv00256
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2013cv00113
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?