Cases 1 - 10 of 72
Antoine Bordelais v. Maria Kuhn, et al
as 23-3176
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTOINE GUY JEAN PAUL BORDELAIS
Defendant / Appellee:
MARIA E. J. KUHN and KUHN COUNSELING CENTER, P.C.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00850
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Kuhn v. 1st Source Bank
as 3:2023cv00702
Plaintiff:
Mark Kuhn
Defendant:
1st Source Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
Kuhn v. Syngenta Crop Protection LLC et al
as 3:2023pq01787
Plaintiff:
Mark Kuhn
Defendant:
Syngenta Crop Protection LLC, Syngenta AG and Chevron U.S.A., Inc.
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00397
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Kuhn v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2022cv00434
Plaintiff:
Jennifer M. Kuhn
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Not Classified By Court:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (RSI)
HARRIS v. KUHN et al
as 1:2022cv01604
Plaintiff:
BRADLEY J. HARRIS
Defendant:
LARRY KUHN, VICTOR GUARISCO, HALEY JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01097
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
KUHN v. SNYDER et al
as 2:2022cv00183
Plaintiff:
CODY KUHN
Defendant:
JERRY SNYDER, CHARLES DUGAN, ASHLYNN GONTHIER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LOUISVILLE & INDIANA RAILROAD v. KUHN DIRTWORKS, INC.
as 1:2022cv00857
Plaintiff:
Louisville & Indiana Railroad and LOUISVILLE & INDIANA RAILROAD,
Defendant:
Kuhn Dirtworks, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
