Cases 1 - 10 of 12
USA v. 2017 Toyota Sienna LE,VIN: 5TDJZ3DC9HS180037
as 1:2021cv03167
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
2017 Toyota Sienna LE,VIN: 5TDJZ3DC9HS180037
Claimant:
Kui Chen
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
Pacheco v. Mt. Fuji Japanese Cuisine, LLC et al
as 1:2018cv00358
Defendant:
Mt. Fuji Japanese Cuisine, LLC, Qin "Sarah" Li, Xin Yun Chen and others
Plaintiff:
Pedro Pacheco
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Kui Chen v. Jefferson Sessions, III
as 17-60174
Petitioner:
KUI CHEN
Respondent:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS, III, U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv07198
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv02575
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chen v. WAI ? Cafe Inc.
as 12-1845
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Yong Kui Chen, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated and Guo Ren Huang
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant - Appellee:
Hao Chen, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, You Huang Zhu, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, Zu Guang Zhu, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated and others
Defendant-Counter-Claimant - Appellant:
Wai Yin Chan
Defendant-Counter-Claimant:
WAI ? Cafe Inc.
Chen v. Holder
as 11-1378
Petitioner:
Xue Kui Chen
Respondent:
Daniel Holder, United States Attorney General
Chen v. Holder
as 11-1046
Petitioner:
Xue Kui Chen
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney General
Chen et al v. WAI ? Cafe Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv07254
Plaintiff:
Yong Kui Chen , Zu Guang Zhu , Hao Chen and others
Defendant:
WAI ? Cafe Inc. and Wai Yin Chan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Chen v. Sushi on Hudson Restaurant Corporation et al
as 1:2010cv04220
Plaintiff:
Jian Kui Chen
Defendant:
Sushi on Hudson Restaurant Corporation , Sushi West Corp. , Dang Hung and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
