Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv08913
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-16700
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Jamia Fernandes v. Centessa Pharmaceuticals PLC et al
as 2:2022cv07030
Plaintiff:
Jamia Fernandes
Defendant:
Centessa Pharmaceuticals PLC, Saurabh Saha, Gregory Weinhoff and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv01771
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv05521
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
John Doe v. Cong Ty Co Phan Modoho et al
as 1:2022cv00409
Defendant:
Cong Ty Co Phan Modoho also known as Modoho JSC doing business as Modoho, Modoho JSC, Dao Huy Dat and others
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00933
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Yi Shao v. John Roberts, Jr., et al
as 22-15857
Plaintiff / Appellant:
YI TAI SHAO, AKA Linda Yi Tai Shao
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN G. ROBERTS, Jr., ANTHONY M. KENNEDY, STEPHEN G. BREYER and others
(PS) Shao v. Roberts, et al.
as 2:2022cv00325
Plaintiff:
Yi Tai Shao and Linda Shao
Defendant:
John G. Roberts, Jr., Anthony M. Kennedy, Stephen Breyer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
v. SHAO et al
as 2:2022at00196
Defendant:
Yi Tai SHAO, John G. Roberts, Jr., Anthony M Kennedy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
