Cases 1 - 10 of 97
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv06349
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 nr Diversity: Notice of Removal
Kulp Minerals LLC v. Apache Corporation
as 2:2023cv00408
Plaintiff:
Kulp Minerals LLC
Defendant:
Apache Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Bryan Kulp et al v. Munchkin, Inc.
as 2:2022cv09381
Plaintiff:
Bryan Kulp, Christina Kulp and Veronica Rodriguez
Defendant:
Munchkin, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv05056
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Kulps v. Kijakazi
as 1:2022cv06523
Plaintiff:
Christine L. Kulps
Defendant:
Commissioner Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Kulp v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 1:2022cv01818
Plaintiff:
Bryanna Kulp
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
(PC) Kulp v. Stanislaus County Sheriff Department et al
as 1:2022cv00829
Plaintiff:
Anthony James Kulp
Defendant:
Stanislaus County Sheriff Department, Jeff Dirske and M. Watson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KULP v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv07855
Plaintiff:
PATRICK KULP
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Nicholas Morrow v. Metro Govt of Nashville & Davidson County, TN, et al
as 22-5232
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NICHOLAS MORROW
Defendant / Appellee:
METROPOLITAN GOVERNMENT OF NASHVILLE & DAVIDSON COUNTY, TN, TOMMY WIDENER, ANDREW KOOSHIAN and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00846
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
