Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1389
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv00041
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
KUNTZMAN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv23365
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW KUNTZMAN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BALLARD v. CAIL et al
as 1:2022cv00002
Plaintiff:
JAMES LEE BALLARD
Defendant:
BRIAN S KRAMER, HEATHER L JONES, BRIAN C RODGERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Greene v. USA, et al
as 21-5398
Defendant / Appellee:
AMANDA HIRST, Officer, Big Sandy USP (FNU), UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, LIEUTENANT ARMES, Big Sandy USP (FNU) and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL GREENE
Kuntzman et al v. Atrium Medical Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv00292
Defendant:
Maquet Cardiovascular US Sales, LLC and Atrium Medical Corporation
Plaintiff:
LouAnne Kuntzman and Melvin Kuntzman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00597
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00536
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joshua Cheli v. Taylorville Community School D, et al
as 20-2033
Defendant / Appellee:
GREGG FUERSTENAU, Superintendent of Taylorville CUSD #3, BOARD OF EDUCATION OF TAYLORVILLE, CUSD #3, TAYLORVILLE COMMUNITY SCHOOL DISTRICT, CUSD #3 and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSHUA L. CHELI
KUNTZMAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv78280
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ANDREW SCOTT KUNTZMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
