Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00571
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Addison et al v. DST Systems, Inc.
as 4:2021mc09187
Plaintiff:
Angela Addison, Charlene Alewel, Kim Anderson and others
Defendant:
DST Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
Addison et al v. DST Systems, Inc.
as 4:2021cv09187
Plaintiff:
Angela Addison, Charlene Alewel, Kim Anderson and others
Defendant:
DST Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
Mecey et al v. Farmington, City of et al
as 4:2019cv01526
Defendant:
Jerrod Mahurin, Gregory Beavers, Clifford Bone and others
Plaintiff:
David Mecey and Robin Mecey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stenger et al v. Bi-State Development Agency of Missouri/Illinois Metropolitan District
as 4:2014cv01655
Plaintiff:
Michael Stenger , Tim Dempsey , Mike Little and others
Defendant:
Bi-State Development Agency of Missouri/Illinois Metropolitan District
Intervenor_defendant:
Amalgamated Transit Union, Diviision 788
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Clark v. City of Park Hills Police Department et al
as 4:2013cv01152
Plaintiff:
Vance Roy Clark
Defendant:
City of Park Hills Police Department, City of Park Hills, Mike Kurtz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kurtz, et al. v. County of Franklin, Missouri, et al.
as 4:2010cv01348
Plaintiff:
Robert Kurtz , Paul Phillips and David Geile
Defendant:
County of Franklin, Missouri , Franklin County Board of Zoning Adjustment , St. Charles Tower, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kurtz et al v. St. Charles Tower, Inc. et al
as 4:2010cv00022
Defendant:
St. Charles Tower, Inc., County of Franklin, Missouri, Franklin County Board of Zoning Adjustment and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Kurtz, Paul Phillips and David Geile
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
