Cases 1 - 10 of 2,701
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00731
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00732
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Barfell v. AMP
as 1:2024cv00724
Plaintiff:
Thomas H L Barfell
Defendant:
AMP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Barfell v. Team Honey Badger Dominos
as 1:2024cv00723
Plaintiff:
Thomas H L Barfell
Defendant:
Team Honey Badger Dominos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Yerks v. Tegels et al
as 2:2024cv00713
Plaintiff:
Jammie L Yerks
Defendant:
Elizabeth Tegels, Dr Galliwalla, Dr Liu and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shrum, Joseph v. O'Malley, Martin
as 3:2024cv00368
Plaintiff:
Joseph L. Shrum
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Lewis, Daniel v. Stafford, Bridgette et al
as 3:2024cv00366
Plaintiff:
Daniel F.W. Lewis
Defendant:
Bridgette L. Stafford, Rey R. Palop, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Long Term Disability Income Plan of Bank of Montreal/Harris et al
as 2:2024cv00670
Plaintiff:
Kari L. Brown
Defendant:
Long Term Disability Income Plan of Bank of Montreal/Harris and BMO Financial Corp. Benefits Administration Committee
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Spielman, Stacy v. O'Malley, Martin
as 3:2024cv00354
Plaintiff:
Stacy L. Spielman
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Williams v. Leach
as 2:2024cv00643
Plaintiff:
Gilbert L Williams, Jr
Defendant:
Heather L Leach
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
