Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Baker v. Grayson Farm & Leasing, Inc. et al
as 7:2024cv00116
Plaintiff:
DeQuilla L. Baker
Defendant:
Grayson Farm & Leasing, Inc., Wescor Farm Operations, LLC., Independence Lumber, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Baker v. Kijakazi
as 2:2022cv00010
Plaintiff:
Erica L. Baker
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Baker v. Kijakazi
as 2:2021cv00037
Plaintiff:
Travis L. Baker
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Baker v. Ross et al
as 1:2020cv01367
Defendant:
Marlon T. Fletcher, Unknown employees of the Dept of Commerce and USPTO, Daniel Swerdlow and others
Plaintiff:
Donald L. Baker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Baker v. Ross et al
as 1:2020cv01245
Defendant:
Wilbur L. Ross, Unknownemployees of the Dept of Commerce and/or USPTO and Andrei Iancu
Plaintiff:
Donald L. Baker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Baker v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 7:2018cv00449
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Clyde L. Baker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
De Armond v. Gurney et al
as 2:2015cv00203
Plaintiff:
Arnold De Armond
Defendant:
Patrick J. Gurney, Anton W. Daniel, S. Darby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baker v. Astrue
as 4:2012cv00039
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Sharon L. Baker
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Fox v. Agape Counseling & Therapeutic Services, Inc. et al
as 4:2012cv00052
Plaintiff:
James E. Fox
Defendant:
Agape Counseling & Therapeutic Services, Inc. , Lena L. Baker-Scott and Sherie R. Mawusi
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00037
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
