Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Duncan v. Saul
as 1:2020cv00389
Plaintiff:
Terri L. Duncan
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Duncan v. Peterson et al
as 3:2020cv00459
Defendant:
Michael Minev, Hometown Health Care, Vincent and others
Plaintiff:
Tommy L. Duncan and Tommy Duncan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Duncan v. Kim, et al.
as 1:2013cv01153
Plaintiff:
Jamaal L. Duncan
Defendant:
Dr. Kim, J. Wang, Rouch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Douglas Zolnierz v. Jack Harris, et al
as 12-16959
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DOUGLAS JOHN ZOLNIERZ, also named as: Douglas J. Zolnierz and Douglas Zolnierz
Defendant - Appellee:
JACK F. HARRIS, BARBARA MUNDELL, GARY DONAHUE and others
Zolnierz v. Harris et al
as 2:2011cv01182
Plaintiff:
Douglas John Zolnierz
Defendant:
Jack F Harris , Barbara Mundell , Gary Donahoe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bilal-Leffall v. Harris et al
as 3:2011cv05071
Plaintiff:
Abdullah F Bilal-Leffall, Jr
Defendant:
Cathi Harris, Paul Temposky and Gregory L Duncan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coley v. Harris et al
as 3:2010cv05112
Plaintiff:
Gregory Coley
Defendant:
Cathi Harris, Paul Temposty and Gregory L Duncan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
State of Montana Department of v. Gregory B. Duncan, et al
as 09-36062
Appellant:
STATE OF MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE
Appellee:
UNITED STATES TRUSRTEE, GREAT FALLS
Debtor-in-Possession - Appellee:
GREGORY B. DUNCAN and LAURIE L. DUNCAN
Trustee - Appellee:
DARCY M. CRUM
Atkins v. Harris et al
as 3:2009cv05625
Plaintiff:
Michael Atkins
Defendant:
Cathi Harris, Paul Temposty and Gregory L Duncan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mujahid v. Harris et al
as 3:2009cv05601
Plaintiff:
Abdullah Mujahid
Defendant:
Cathi Harris, Paul Temposty and Gregory L Duncan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
