Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Cook v. Marshall
as 24-30222
Plaintiff:
Stephen D. Cook, Doctor; In his capacity as Co-Trustee of Marshall Heritage Foundation
Defendant:
Preston L. Marshall, In his capacity as Co-Trustee of Peroxisome Trust
McGruder v. Lumpkin et al
as 4:2021cv04244
Plaintiff:
Gary Wayne McGruder
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin, Lori Davis, Josh Reno and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cook et al v. Marshall
as 2:2021cv02139
Not Classified By Court:
Dr. Stephen D Cook and Preston L Marshall
Plaintiff:
Stephen D Cook
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harris v. Lumpkin
as 7:2021cv00143
Petitioner:
Claude Harris
Respondent:
Edward L. Marshall and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Chambers v. Marshall et al
as 7:2021cv00087
Respondent:
Edward L. Marshall and Bobby Lumpkin
Petitioner:
Mark Odin Chambers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Loften v. Schroeder et al
as 9:2020cv00233
Defendant:
Robert W. Schroeder, M. Crone, Edward L. Marshall and others
Plaintiff:
James Eric Loften
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv03013
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Biter v. Director, TDCJ
as 3:2019cv00283
Defendant:
TDCJ Director
Plaintiff:
Michael Allan Biter
Interested Party:
Edward L Marshall
Respondent:
Director of TDCJ CID Lorie Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Saldivar v. Davis et al
as 6:2019cv00231
Petitioner:
Yolanda Saldivar
Defendant:
Edward L Marshall
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ Lorie Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Stephen Cook v. Preston Marshall
as 19-30200
Defendant / Appellant:
PRESTON L. MARSHALL, In his capacity as Co-Trustee of Peroxisome Trust
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DOCTOR STEPHEN D. COOK, In his capacity as Co-Trustee of Marshall Heritage Foundation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
