Cases 21 - 30 of 50
Trent L Alexander Sr v. Warden
as 2:2012cv04949
Petitioner:
Trent L Alexander, Sr
Respondent:
Warden
Scannell v. Washington State Bar Association et al
as 2:2012cv00683
Plaintiff:
John R Scannell
Defendant:
Washington State Bar Association, Board of Governors of WSBA, Russell M Aokii and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alexander v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company
as 3:2012cv01820
Plaintiff:
Ricky L. Alexander
Defendant:
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and McKesson Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mary L Alexander v. Michael J Astrue
as 5:2012cv00104
Plaintiff:
Mary L Alexander
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv05970
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marshall v. Washington State Bar Association et al
as 3:2011cv05319
Plaintiff:
Bradley Marshall
Defendant:
Washington State Bar Association , Board of Governors of WSBA , Stanley A Sebastian and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Charles Reed v. Joseph Coleman, et al
as 11-35248
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES V REED
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSEPH H. COLEMAN, FAYE KENNEDY, WILLIAM W. BAKER and others
Eddie Bush v. Washington State Dept. Corr., et al
as 11-35142
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDDIE JOE BUSH
Defendant - Appellee:
WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, KATHY BIRDSELL, AND OTHER UNKNOWN RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT OF THE CORRECTIONS EMPLOYEES and others
Eddie Bush v. USDC-WAESP
as 11-70480
:
In re: EDDIE JOE BUSH
Petitioner:
EDDIE JOE BUSH
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON, SPOKANE
Real Party In Interest:
WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, KATHY BIRDSELL, AND OTHER UNKNOWN RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT OF THE CORRECTIONS EMPLOYEES and others
Reed v. Coleman et al
as 2:2010cv01805
Plaintiff:
Charles V Reed
Defendant:
Joseph H Coleman, Faye Kennedy, William W Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
