Cases 1 - 10 of 34
GRAY et al v. ASTRAZENECA LP et al
as 2:2020cv07367
Plaintiff:
MARSH L. GRAY and JOE GRAY
Defendant:
PROCTER & GAMBLE MANUFACTURING COMPANY, ASTRAZENECA LP, PFIZER INC. and others
In Re:
PROTON-PUMP INHIBITOR PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (No. II)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MERCADO V. GRAY, ET AL.
as 2:2019cv13982
Defendant:
brian L Gray, BAYLOR TRUCKING, INC., JOHN DOE 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
Edgardo M Mercado and EDGARDO M. MERCADO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
GRAY v. ABBOTT LABORATORIES et al
as 2:2019cv09855
Defendant:
ABBOTT LABORATORIES, TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., TAKEDA DEVELOPMENT CENTER AMERICAS, INC. F/K/A TAKEDA GLOBAL RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT CENTER, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
VERNON L. GRAY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GRAY v. SMITH
as 3:2017cv00239
Petitioner:
DWIGHT L. GRAY, JR.
Respondent:
BARRY SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv01713
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
BUTZ et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE et al
as 2:2013cv01109
Plaintiff:
DAVE BUTZ , WILLIAM L. AYDELETTE , REBECCA B. AYDELETTE and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE, NFL PROPERTIES LLC and JOHN DOES 1 THROUGH 100, INCLUSIVE
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
GRAY v. ACANDS, INC.
as 2:2011cv57852
Plaintiff:
CHARLES L GRAY
Defendant:
ACANDS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
GRAY v. FOSTER WHEELER CO.
as 2:2011cv59869
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH L. GRAY
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER CO.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
GRAY v. MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
as 2:2011cv54772
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH L GRAY
Defendant:
MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
GRAY v. LUCKENBACH STEAMSHIP CO.
as 2:2011cv57851
Plaintiff:
CHARLES L GRAY
Defendant:
LUCKENBACH STEAMSHIP CO.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
