Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Meyers v. Perry et al
as 2:2021cv00031
Defendant:
Ofc. Cornelius Bland, Officer Mr. Lockhart, Ofc. Ms. Bernard and others
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. The Commonwealth of Virginia, et al
as 2:2020cv00359
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Virginia, Virginia Alcoholic Beverage Control Authority and Jimmy L. Jackson, III
Plaintiff:
jimmy jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Latuga et al
as 1:2019cv01029
Plaintiff:
Corieonte L. Jackson
Defendant:
Wolcott Rivers P.C., Brian M. Latuga and Janee' D. Joslin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Franklin v. Wray et al
as 3:2017cv00797
Plaintiff:
Kim L. Franklin
Defendant:
Christopher Wray, Mike Pompeo, Michael S. Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor et al v. Alaska Native General Services, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv00456
Plaintiff:
Taylor, Donald Taylor and GSI, LLC
Defendant:
Alaska Native General Services, LLC, H Benjamin Brucker, Sonnie L. Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McCloud v. Jackson
as 4:2014cv00101
Plaintiff:
Michael McCloud
Defendant:
L. Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Manis
as 2:2014cv00079
Petitioner:
Dietrich L. Jackson
Respondent:
Carl Manis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Professional Foreclosure Corporation of Virginia et al v. Robinson et al
as 1:2009cv00204
Plaintiff:
Professional Foreclosure Corporation of Virginia and Samuel I. White
Defendant:
Ronald R. Robinson, Jr., Elijah Jackson, Mary L. Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Jackson v. United States of America
as 1:2008cv00785
Plaintiff:
William L. Jackson
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Jackson v. Johnson
as 1:2007cv00194
Petitioner:
Sylvester L. Jackson
Respondent:
Gene M Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
