Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00807
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00351
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
US v. Daniel Spence
as 21-6543
Defendant / Appellant:
DANIEL L. SPENCE, a/k/a Daniel L. Johnson
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Rogers Morgan v. Caliber Home Loans, Inc.
as 20-1745
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PATRICE L. JOHNSON, On behalf of themselves individually and on behlaf of a Class and Subclass of similarly situated persons and ROGERS MORGAN
Defendant / Appellee:
CALIBER HOME LOANS, INC.
Tyrell Johnson v. Harold Clarke
as 20-6843
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE
Petitioner / Appellant:
TYRELL L. JOHNSON
Robert Heghmann v. Democratic National Committee
as 19-2211
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT A. HEGHMANN
Defendant / Appellee:
DEMOCRATIC CONGRESSIONAL CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE, DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE, DORIS CROUSE-MAYS and others
Morgan et al v. Caliber Home Loans Inc.
as 8:2019cv02797
Defendant:
Caliber Home Loans Inc.
Plaintiff:
Rogers Morgan and Patrice L Johnson
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 2605
US v. Devonte Johnson
as 19-4570
Defendant / Appellant:
DEVONTE L. JOHNSON
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Parshall v. Charter Financial Corporation et al
as 1:2018cv02349
Defendant:
Edward D. Smith, David L. Strobel, Thomas M. Lane and others
Plaintiff:
Paul Parshall
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Federal Trade Commission et al v. Next-Gen, Inc. et al
as 3:2018mc00142
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission and State of Missouri
Defendant:
Next-Gen, Inc., Westport Enterprises, Inc., Opportunities Unlimited Publications, Inc. and others
Receiver:
Eric L. Johnson
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
