Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv05904
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
King v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 5:2023cv00030
Petitioner:
Cedric L. King
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00095
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
SCOTT v. THOMAS et al
as 4:2022cv00088
Plaintiff:
DENNIS DEMETRIUS SCOTT
Defendant:
SHERMAN THOMAS, DANIEL L KING, RODERICK JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Danielle Bey v. Centralized Infractions Bureau et al
as 1:2021cv03884
Plaintiff:
Malka Yasmin Danielle Bey
Defendant:
State of Georgia, Centralized Infractions Bureau, Georgia Superior Court and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
King v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv01471
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
Sarah L. King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DAVIS v. HAMRICK et al
as 4:2018cv00255
Defendant:
Counselor CHESTER, Warden DWIGHT HAMRICK, Counselor BEACHAM and others
Plaintiff:
SANTWON ANTONIO DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. Alan
as 4:2019cv00263
Plaintiff:
Martique L. King
Defendant:
Officer Contreras Alan and Southern District of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murphy v. Farmer et al
as 3:2015cv00092
Plaintiff:
John H. Murphy
Defendant:
Millard C. Farmer, Jr. , Alfred L. King, Jr. , Larry King, P.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv00146
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Race Discrimination
Type:
Other Statutes
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
