Cases 21 - 30 of 43
BROWN v. DR. WILSON et al
as 1:2015cv00224
Plaintiff:
DANIEL LYNN BROWN, Jr.
Defendant:
BUREAU OF PRISONS STAFF, J. F. CARAWAY, DR. MICKEY CHO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
FULKS v. LARIVA
as 2:2015cv00033
Petitioner:
CHADRICK FULKS
Respondent:
L. LARIVA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
SMITH v. LARIVA
as 2:2015cv00027
Respondent:
L. LARIVA
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER W. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-5002
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
COLLIER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2014cv00365
Defendant:
ALL MEMBERS OF THE UTILIZATION REVIEW COMMITTEE, T. BAILEY, T. BIXLER and others
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY LEON COLLIER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
HARRIS v. UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL et al
as 2:2014cv00334
Petitioner:
RUSSELL HARRIS, JR.
Respondent:
L. LARIVA and UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01817
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EADY v. LARIVA et al
as 2:2014cv00325
Defendant:
THOMAS E. BAILEY, KIM KLINK, L. LARIVA and others
Plaintiff:
AUBREY LYNN EADY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
PRINCE v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISION et al
as 2:2014cv00288
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISION, L. LARIVA and TERRE HAUTE FCI
Plaintiff:
PRINCE RASHADA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
HAROLD v. DR. WILSON et al
as 2:2014cv00281
Defendant:
BAILY, K. KLINK, L. LARIVA and others
Plaintiff:
LONDON LEON HAROLD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
