Cases 1 - 10 of 260
Andreas Moore, Jr. v. Michelle Hoffman
as 24-1586
Petitioner:
ANDREAS L. MOORE, JR.
Respondent:
MICHELLE HOFFMAN
Andreas Moore, Jr. v. Michelle Hoffman
as 24-1561
Petitioner:
ANDREAS L. MOORE, JR.
Respondent:
MICHELLE HOFFMAN
Andreas Moore, Jr. v. Karl Hoffman, et al
as 24-1104
Plaintiff:
ANDREAS L. MOORE, JR.
Defendant:
KARL HOFFMAN, Doctor, ROSLYN HUNEKE, GARY ASBERRY and others
Luginbyhl v. Moore et al
as 5:2023cv00939
Defendant:
Cimarron Correctional Facility, Darrell L Moore, Judge Phillip C Corley and others
Plaintiff:
Levi Luginbyhl
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Moore v. Stanly et al
as 3:2023cv01151
Plaintiff:
Timothy L. Moore
Defendant:
Stanly, Leggassy, Person and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CANNAFAX v. BUCKS COUNTY OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2023cv01274
Plaintiff:
JEREMY TYLER CANNAFAX and JEREMY KYLE CANNAFAX
Defendant:
BUCKS COUNTY OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, WARDEN MATELLUS, DEPUTY WARDEN KELLY REED and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. United States Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2023cv00072
Petitioner:
Bernard L. Moore
Defendant:
United States Bureau of Prisons, United States Marshals Service, Talahatchie Correctional and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Gordon Moore v. K. Bennett
as 23-1418
Petitioner / Appellant:
GORDON L. MOORE
Respondent / Appellee:
M. SEGAL, Warden and K. BENNETT, Warden
Brian Alford v. Gary Mohr, et al
as 22-4082
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRIAN KEITH ALFORD
Defendant / Appellee:
GARY C. MOHR, et al, ERNIE MOORE, JOCELYN SCHWEITZER and others
Moore v. Warden FCI-Pekin
as 1:2022cv01352
Petitioner:
Gordon L Moore
Respondent:
Warden FCI-Pekin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
