Cases 1 - 10 of 71
Smith v. Thurman
as 2:2024cv00004
Plaintiff:
Donald L. Smith
Defendant:
Ronald Thurman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. USA
as 1:2023cv00054
Petitioner:
Derrick L Smith
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Smith v. Family Dollar Inc et al
as 2:2022cv02375
Plaintiff:
Vinnie L. Smith
Defendant:
Family Dollar Inc. and Dollar Tree Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
Smith et al v. Grant et al
as 2:2021cv02302
Defendant:
JANE DOE, City of Dyersburg Tennessee, LOGAN ABBOTT and others
Plaintiff:
Felicia Currie, Charmin Smith, Tyrone L Smith, Sr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Smith v. Social Security Administration Commissioner of
as 3:2020cv00314
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Plaintiff:
Clarence L Smith
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Avery v. Blackburn et al
as 1:2020cv00018
Defendant:
Clinton J. Morgan, Melissa Roberge, Rob Mcguire and others
Plaintiff:
Frederick Alexander Avery
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. USA
as 4:2019cv00083
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Takesta L Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Smith, Jr. v. City of Jackson, Tennessee et al
as 1:2019cv01061
Defendant:
Investigator FNU Long, Daryl Hubbard, Julien Wiser and others
Plaintiff:
Reese L. Smith, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Modi v. Envision Healthcare Corporation et al
as 3:2018cv00648
Defendant:
Christopher A. Holden, Joey A. Jacobs, Carol J. Burt and others
Plaintiff:
Anirudh Modi
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Burns v. Smith et al
as 3:2018cv00561
Plaintiff:
Debbie Burns
Defendant:
Jimmy L. Smith, Jr., Richard L. Smith and Cora Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
