Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Roy Fisher, et al v. Tucson Unified School District, et al
as 22-16479
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROY FISHER and JOSIE FISHER, Next of kin to Elizabeth Fisher
Plaintiff:
MARIA MENDOZA, Individually and on behalf of Stephen Mendoza, EDWARD A. CONTRERAS, BOYD LEWIS and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellee:
TUCSON UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
SIDNEY L. SUTTON, SALLY J. SUTTON, As Parents and Natural Guardians and Next Friend of Sean Sutton, JOHN R. CENTENO and others
Maria Mendoza, et al v. Tucson Unified School District, et al
as 22-16478
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARIA MENDOZA, Individually and on behalf of Stephen Mendoza and EDWARD A. CONTRERAS
Plaintiff:
ROY FISHER, JOSIE FISHER, Next of kin to Elizabeth Fisher, BOYD LEWIS and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellee:
TUCSON UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
SIDNEY L. SUTTON, SALLY J. SUTTON, As Parents and Natural Guardians and Next Friend of Sean Sutton, JOHN R. CENTENO and others
Roy Fisher, et al v. Tucson Unified School District, et al
as 22-16480
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ROY FISHER, JOSIE FISHER, Next of kin to Elizabeth Fisher, MARIA MENDOZA, Individually and on behalf of Stephen Mendoza and others
Plaintiff:
BOYD LEWIS, ELIZABETH LEWIS, Next of kin of Elizabeth, Ellen, Warren, and Jeff Lewis, LLOYD D. HALL and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
TUCSON UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
SIDNEY L. SUTTON, SALLY J. SUTTON, As Parents and Natural Guardians and Next Friend of Sean Sutton, JOHN R. CENTENO and others
Roy Fisher, et al v. Tucson Unified School District, et al
as 20-16485
Intervenor Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
SIDNEY L. SUTTON, SIDNEY TAIZE, As Parent, Natural guardian and Next Friend of Jonathan Taize, Lisa Taize and Joshua Taize, AKA Sidney Taiz, SALLY J. SUTTON, As Parents and Natural Guardians and Next Friend of Sean Sutton and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JOYCE BROWN HUTTON, Next of kin of Mondre Hutton, ROY FISHER, MARIA MENDOZA, Individually and on behalf of Stephen Mendoza and others
Defendant / Appellant:
TUCSON UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
Oil Re-Refining Company, Inc. v. Sutton Salvage, LLC et al
as 2:2013cv00236
Plaintiff:
Oil Re-Refining Company, Inc.
Defendant:
Sutton Salvage, LLC, Mitchell's Mobile Mashing and Mitchell L. Sutton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607 Real Property Tort to Land
Canzoni v. Sutton et al
as 3:2012cv05921
Plaintiff:
Amas Canzoni and Tanana Canzoni
Defendant:
Lisa L. Sutton, Thurston County, Columbia State Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Culp et al v. South Sound Bank of Olympia Washington et al
as 3:2011cv05865
Plaintiff:
Rodney Vernon Culp, George Leon Vasquez and JoAnn Vasquez
Defendant:
South Sound Bank of Olympia Washington , Dan Yarrington , Wyndie Dwyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Sutton et al
as 3:2011cv01064
Defendant:
Columbia County, Crestview Missions, State of Oregon and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401 IRS: Tax Liability
Roy Fisher, et al v. Tucson Unified School District, et al
as 10-15407
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ROY FISHER, JOSIE FISHER, MARIA MENDOZA and others
Defendant - Appellant:
TUCSON UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
Defendant-intervenor:
SIDNEY L. SUTTON, SALLY J. SUTTON, JOHN R. CENTENO and others
Plaintiff-intervenor - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Roy Fisher, et al v. Tucson Unified School District, et al
as 10-15375
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROY FISHER and JOSIE FISHER
Plaintiff:
MARIA MENDOZA and EDWARD A. CONTRERAS
Defendant - Appellee:
TUCSON UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
Defendant-intervenor - Appellee:
SIDNEY L. SUTTON, SALLY J. SUTTON, JOHN R. CENTENO and others
Plaintiff-intervenor:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
