Cases 1 - 10 of 392
United States of America v. Green (Johnson)
as 24-1017
Defendant:
DARRYL JOHNSON, NORMAN WORKMAN, CLAYTON GREEN and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Worsley v. Osborn Correctional Institution
as 3:2024cv00612
Plaintiff:
Gamail Lamar Worsley
Defendant:
Osborn Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jaynes v. Quiros et al
as 3:2024cv00267
Plaintiff:
Troy Lamar Jaynes
Defendant:
Quiros, John Doe, Lavetta and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sands v. Sands
as 3:2024cv00135
Plaintiff:
Lamar Sands
Defendant:
Bernadette Sands
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hudson v. Gerson et al
as 1:2023cv08876
Plaintiff:
Lamar Hudson
Defendant:
Esq. Alan Gerson, Abrom Badalov and Khusial Bhagroo
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv08874
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Brown v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2023cv05924
Plaintiff:
Arthur Lamar Brown
Defendant:
The City of New York, Warden Ronald Miller, Captain Moses and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wiggins v. Stover et al
as 3:2023cv00842
Petitioner:
LaMar Wiggins
Respondent:
Rick Stover, John Doe and Colette S. Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Jaynes v. Sweeney et al
as 3:2023cv00834
Plaintiff:
Troy Lamar Jaynes
Defendant:
Robert J. Sweeney, John T. Walkley and Vicky H. Hutchinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04345
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12132 Americans with Disabilities Act - Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
