Cases 1 - 10 of 48
Card v. Tacoma Municipal Court et al
as 3:2024cv05007
Plaintiff:
Tony Lamar Card
Defendant:
Tacoma Municipal Court, All City Bail Bonds, Jonathan Lack and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Card v. Christel et al
as 3:2024cv05005
Plaintiff:
Tony Lamar Card
Defendant:
David W Christel, Tiffany M Cartwright and Grady J Leupold
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Card v. Leupold
as 3:2023cv06152
Plaintiff:
Tony Lamar Card
Defendant:
Grady J Leupold
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Card v. King County Superior Court et al
as 2:2023cv01343
Plaintiff:
Tony Lamar Card
Defendant:
King County Superior Court, Jonathan Lack, Aimee Sutton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Card v. Tacoma Municipal Court et al
as 3:2023cv05781
Plaintiff:
Tony Lamar Card
Defendant:
Tacoma Municipal Court, Randall Hanson, Steve Krupa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
El Bey v. State of Washington
as 4:2022cv05035
Plaintiff:
Tariffian El Bey, Tyre Wortham and Tyree Lamar Wortham
Defendant:
State of Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Greer v. Jackson
as 4:2022cv05028
Plaintiff:
Dedric Lamar Greer
Defendant:
Rob Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thiel et al v. Adams County Public Hospital District #2 et al
as 2:2021cv00279
Plaintiff:
Karen Thiel, Lamar Thiel and Estate of Karen Theil
Defendant:
Adams County Public Hospital District #2 a Washington Public Hospital District doing business as East Adams Rural Healthcare doing business as East Adams Rural Hospital and Matthew Mecham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
DaGreat v. Haynes et al
as 3:2021cv05080
Plaintiff:
NB'Tehute Heru-Ptah DaGreat and Terrell Lamar Wilson
Defendant:
J Jolly, T Cardin and Ronald Haynes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
