Cases 1 - 10 of 52
Berry et al v. Walz et al
as 0:2024cv00962
Petitioner:
Cederic Lamont Berry and Cedric Lamont Berry
Respondent:
Tim Walz and Paul Schnell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv02690
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv02689
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Klapp et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv01485
Plaintiff:
Adam Klapp, Charles Kinnard, Darrius Pearson and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Chestnut et al v. Klund et al
as 0:2022cv02714
Plaintiff:
Marvin Lewis Chestnut, Lawrence Anthony Barnes, Charles Nguyen Thorstad and others
Defendant:
Darcy Klund, Michael Kennedy, Joseph Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Perry v. USA DO NOT DOCKET. ALL DOCKETING OCCURS IN THE CRIMINAL CASE.
as 0:2020cv01443
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Quentin Lamont Lavell Perry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Walsh et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02223
Plaintiff:
Steven Yinger, Karen Wilson, Neil Whitt and others
Defendant:
Aearo, LLC, 3M Company, Aearo Holdings, LLC and others
Johnson et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02199
Plaintiff:
Brandon Lambert, Roshando Danette Johnson, David Kramer and others
Defendant:
3M Company, Aearo Holdings, LLC, Does 1-50 and others
Pickens et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02201
Plaintiff:
Brian S. Price, Scott Roe, David Riley and others
Defendant:
3M Occupational Safety LLC, Aearo, LLC, 3M Company and others
Cowen et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02185
Plaintiff:
William Curtis, II, Kurt Everett Darby, Jack Duncan and others
Defendant:
3M Company, Aearo, LLC, Aearo Holdings, LLC and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
