Cases 1 - 10 of 65
Weathers v. Cooley-Dismukes et al
as 5:2026ct03113
Plaintiff:
Richard B. Weathers
Defendant:
Leslie Cooley-Dismukes, Todd Ishee, Jodi Harrison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniel Parsons v. Todd Ishee
as 26-6412
Plaintiff:
DANIEL B. PARSONS
Defendant:
TODD E. ISHEE, GARY JUNKER, MICHAEL HARDEE and others
Hines v. Cooley Dismukes et al
as 5:2026ct03053
Plaintiff:
Corey Tashombae Hines
Defendant:
Leslie Cooley Dismukes, Peter R. Buchholtz, Larry Dail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hazel v. Dismukes et al
as 5:2026ct03027
Plaintiff:
Timothy Lamont Hazel
Defendant:
Leslie C. Dismukes, Larry Dail, Morris Reid and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murdock v. Dail et al
as 5:2025ct03304
Plaintiff:
Ajanaku E. Murdock
Defendant:
Larry Dail, Ms. Lynch, Mr. White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ronald Sutherland, Jr. v. John Sapper
as 25-6560
Plaintiff:
RONALD KEITH SUTHERLAND, JR.
Defendant:
JOHN SAPPER, ASHLEY HUGHES, JASON W. COHOON and others
Harris v. North Carolina Department of Adult Corrections et al
as 5:2025ct03135
Plaintiff:
Patrick O'Neal Harris
Defendant:
North Carolina Department of Adult Corrections, Administrative Staff of Corporation, John Doe 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parsons v. Sullivan et al
as 5:2023ct03020
Plaintiff:
Daniel B. Parsons
Defendant:
Nicole Sullivan, Todd Ishee, Gary Junker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ronald Sutherland, Jr. v. John Sapper
as 22-7163
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONALD KEITH SUTHERLAND, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN SAPPER, ASHLEY HUGHES, JASON W. COHOON and others
White v. Buffalo et al
as 5:2022ct03188
Plaintiff:
Dwight White and Dwight Edward White, Sr.
Defendant:
Eddie Buffalo, Eric Hooks, Timothy Moose and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
