Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Butler v. Caldwell
as 5:2018cv02753
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Butler
Defendant:
Warden Laura Caldwell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cash v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 9:2018cv02571
Defendant:
Laura Caldwell, John Doe and South Carolina Department of Corrections
Plaintiff:
Jacob Osteen Cash
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kough v. Fowler et al
as 5:2018cv01706
Plaintiff:
Richard Kough
Defendant:
Mr. Fowler, Lt. Windham, Capt. Copeland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitlock v. Caldwell
as 2:2017cv03335
Petitioner:
Arteasa Maurice Whitlock
Respondent:
Laura Caldwell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McDaniels v. Caldwell
as 1:2017cv03288
Petitioner:
Kevin Wayne McDaniels
Respondent:
Laura Caldwell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Johnson v. Stirling et al
as 9:2017cv02209
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Johnson
Defendant:
Bryan P Stirling, Jonathan Lane, Laura Caldwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. Wilson et al
as 4:2017cv01451
Petitioner:
Marcus Hill
Respondent:
Laura Caldwell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Greer v. Tyger River Correctional Institution
as 8:2017cv00537
Petitioner:
Joshua Ray Greer
Respondent:
Laura Caldwell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Christopher West v. William Byars, Jr.
as 15-7610
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER WEST, a/k/a Christopher Gearl West
Defendant - Appellee:
DIRECTOR WILLIAM R. BYARS, JR., in their individual and official capacity as corrections employees, under color of state law, WARDEN TIMOTHY RILEY, in their individual and official capacity as corrections employees, under color of state law, ASSOCIATE WARDEN GARY LANE, in their individual and official capacity as corrections employees, under color of state law and others
Brian Keith Nesbitt v. Tim Riley
as 15-6835
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRIAN KEITH NESBITT
Defendant - Appellee:
TIM RILEY, Warden, BRYAN P. STIRLING, Directory of the Department of Corrections, AMY SPENCER and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
