Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Malone v. English et al
as 3:2024cv00162
Plaintiff:
Lavelle Malone
Defendant:
English, Aaron Smith, Mallot and others
Not Yet Classified:
MIAMI E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Malone v. City of Akron, Ohio et al.
as 5:2023cv02273
Plaintiff:
Ladamien Lavelle Malone
Defendant:
City of Akron, Ohio, City of Akron Police Department, John Edwards, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lavelle Malone v. Jenny McKinney, et al
as 23-3243
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LAVELLE MALONE
Defendant / Appellee:
JENNY MCKINNEY, RN, in their official capacity and SAKIRU T. ADETUNJI, Nurse, in their official capacity
Malone v. Benjamin et al
as 3:2023cv00944
Plaintiff:
Lavelle Malone
Defendant:
Benjamin, Parole Officer, Officer and others
Not Classified By Court:
MIAMI E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Malone v. Ivers et al
as 3:2022cv00274
Plaintiff:
Lavelle Malone
Defendant:
L Ivers, John Doe, Jane Doe and others
Not Classified By Court:
MIAMI E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MALONE v. CARTER et al
as 1:2021cv00661
Defendant:
INDIANAPOLIS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPT., COUNTY OF MARION-CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, CAROLE JOHNSON and others
Plaintiff:
LAVELLE MALONE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MALONE v. REAGLE
as 1:2020cv03083
Petitioner:
LAVELLE MALONE
Respondent:
REAGLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MALONE v. ZATECKY
as 1:2017cv01686
Petitioner:
LAVELLE MALONE
Miscellaneou:
PENDLETON CF (Court Use Only)
Respondent:
DUSHAN ZATECKY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MALONE v. HANKS
as 1:2013cv00358
Respondent:
CRAIG HANKS
Petitioner:
LAVELLE MALONE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
