Cases 21 - 30 of 1,032
Son Vuong v. William Hall, Jr., et al
as 23-13737
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SON THI VUONG
Defendant / Appellee:
WILLIAM DEAN HALL, JR., JOSHUA C. CANTON, TERRY P. LEWIS and others
Comley v. Lawson et al
as 2:2023cv00960
Plaintiff:
Derek Comley
Defendant:
Deputy Lawson, Judge Burns and Charlotte County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ANDERSON v. LAWSON et al
as 1:2023cv00262
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO ANDERSON
Defendant:
K LAWSON, J PERDUE and C WOODLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04940
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
KANE et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2023cv14320
Plaintiff:
TIFFANY KANE and PARLENE LAWSON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 0134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
Bryan Jones v. Telfair SP Warden, et al
as 23-13459
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRYAN LAWSON JONES, a.k.a. Vizion
Defendant / Appellee:
TELFAIR SP WARDEN, DEPUTY WARDEN VERONICA STEWART, DEPUTY WARDEN MARCUS and others
LAWSON v. KANE et al
as 2:2023cv14319
Plaintiff:
PARLENE LAWSON
Defendant:
TIFFANY KANE and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA D/B/A UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 0134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
LAWSON v. SOUTHEAST CONSTRUCTION GROUP LLC
as 5:2023cv00402
Plaintiff:
CHARISSE LAWSON
Defendant:
SOUTHEAST CONSTRUCTION GROUP LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
LAWSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv34333
Plaintiff:
BRYAN LAWSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
LAWSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv30482
Plaintiff:
JEFF LAWSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
