Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Keller v. USA et al
as 1:2018cv00160
Plaintiff:
Daniel E Keller
Defendant:
usa, Department of Justice, Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dwayne Smiley, Sr. v. Issam Harmoush, et al
as 18-40344
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DWAYNE ANTHONY SMILEY, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
ISSAM HARMOUSH, Doctor, H. PLESSALA, Aid, E. SONIER, Administrator and others
Keller v. USA et al
as 2:2018cv00066
Plaintiff:
Daniel E Keller
Defendant:
USA, Department of Justice, Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smiley v. Harmoush et al
as 1:2017cv00277
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Anthony Smiley, Sr
Defendant:
Issam Harmoush, H Plessala, E Sonier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woodard v. United States of America et al
as 1:2017cv00174
Plaintiff:
Macquillie Woodard, Jr
Defendant:
United States of America, League Medical Concepts/Correct Care Solutions, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Buchanan v. University of Texas Medical et al
as 1:2017cv00076
Plaintiff:
Earl Buchanan
Defendant:
University of Texas Medical, League Medical Concept, Bureau of prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Buchanan v. University of Texas Medical et al
as 5:2017cv00079
Plaintiff:
Earl Buchanan
Defendant:
University of Texas Medical, League Medical Concept, Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Murray v. Samuels et al
as 1:2016cv00197
Plaintiff:
James Samuel Murray
Defendant:
Charles E Samuels, Jr, John A Keller, Frank Lara and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gepson v. League Medical Concepts, et al
as 1:2016cv00141
Plaintiff:
Vincent P Gepson
Defendant:
League Medical Concepts Inc, FNU Polavarpu, FNU Henderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richardson v. League Medical Concepts et al
as 1:2016cv00062
Plaintiff:
Bryan Keith Richardson
Defendant:
League Medical Concepts, FNU Polaurapu, FNU Bryd and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
