Cases 1 - 10 of 55
Robert Lee Johnson v. City of Pomona et al
as 2:2024cv00181
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Johnson
Defendant:
City of Pomona, Michael Ellis, Michel Ellis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson
as 3:2022cv05432
Petitioner:
Jarrel Lee Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01672
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Taquan Jones v. Hollywood Unlocked, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv07929
Plaintiff:
TaQuan JONES
Defendant:
UNLOCKED, HOLLYWOOD, ROBERT KAWAN CLOSS, GUARDINI BELLEFLEUR and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hollywood Unlocked, Inc. et al v. Lifetime Entertainment Services, LLC et al
as 2:2020cv11273
Plaintiff:
Jason Lee Johnson and Hollywood Unlocked, Inc.
Defendant:
Does 1-10, Lifetime Entertainment Services, LLC, A and E Television Networks, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Jason Lee Johnson v. Andrew Saul
as 5:2020cv01357
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Jason Lee Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Calkins et al v. Gilead Sciences, Inc.
as 4:2020cv01884
Plaintiff:
Brian F. McMorris, Felix Jones, Nena Walby and others
Defendant:
Gilead Sciences, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rivers et al v. Gilead Sciences, Inc.
as 4:2019cv07991
Plaintiff:
Jacquelyne R. Beasley, Detric Laster, Rachel Woods Shannon and others
Defendant:
Gilead Sciences, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chrysie Anagnostou et al v. Los Angeles County et al
as 2:2019cv08111
Defendant:
Daniel Lee Johnson, Zhaojun Huang, Maria Capiral Capiral and others
Plaintiff:
Chrysie Anagnostou
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Mary Lee Johnson v. Roger A. Luebs et al
as 5:2019cv01619
Defendant:
Gerald Richard Gregory, III, Judge Roger A. Luebs, Renee Rupp and others
Plaintiff:
Mary Lee Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.