Cases 1 - 10 of 119
Department of Labor v. Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery Assoc of Greater New Haven PC et al
as 3:2024cv00811
Petitioner:
Department of Labor
Respondent:
Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery Assoc of Greater New Haven PC and Leonard Skope
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Leonard v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00378
Plaintiff:
James H. Leonard, Jr.
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cenatiempo v. Leonard
as 3:2022cv01640
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Lynn Cenatiempo
Defendant:
Elizabeth Leonard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Johnson v. Riverside Health Care Center Inc
as 3:2022cv01633
Plaintiff:
Leonard Johnson
Defendant:
Riverside Health Care Center Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2612 Family & Medical Leave Act
Berkowitz et al v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv01438
Plaintiff:
JEROME JAY BERKOWITZ, GREGORY ALLEN AKERVIK, ANGELA ALBERTSON and others
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation, Boehringer Ingelheim USA Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Berger et al v. USA
as 3:2022cv01204
Plaintiff:
Leonard Berger and Todd Berger
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Talton v. Commissioner of Correction
as 3:2022cv00384
Petitioner:
Leonard R. Talton
Respondent:
Commissioner of Correction
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Desrochers et al v. Quick Auto, LLC et al
as 3:2020cv01355
Plaintiff:
Leonard Desrochers and Marie Desrochers
Defendant:
Carvant Financial LLC and Quick Auto, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Currytto v. Doe et al
as 3:2020cv01213
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Preston, Richard Furey and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin W. Currytto
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
