Cases 51 - 60 of 422
Williams et al v. Lewis et al
as 4:2022cv00030
Plaintiff:
Bryan Mikel Williams, Kenneth Morris, Tyrese Deomineke Mosby and others
Defendant:
Mike Lewis, Ulrich and Sgt Victoria Davenport
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lebanion et al v. Health Directions, Inc. et al
as 6:2022cv00031
Plaintiff:
Brian Lebanion
Defendant:
Health Directions, Inc., Professional Home Health Care Agency, Inc. and Joyce Lewis
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2612 Family and Medical Leave Act
Adrio v. Bibelhauser et al
as 3:2021cv00748
Plaintiff:
Brayden C. Adrio
Defendant:
Mark Bibelhauser, Eric Lewis, Jeffrey Nipp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv
Cleaver v. Southern Health Partners, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv00747
Plaintiff:
Gayla Cleaver
Defendant:
Southern Health Partners, Inc., John Snell, Jane/John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vance v. Wormuth et al
as 3:2021cv00730
Plaintiff:
Edward W. Vance
Defendant:
Christine Wormuth, R. Scott Dingle, Mark R. Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 bb
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv00295
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Arnett v. Lewis et al
as 4:2021cv00113
Plaintiff:
Bobby Eugene Arnett
Defendant:
Jailer Mike Lewis and Hopkins County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks et al v. 3M Company et al
as 7:2021cv00083
Defendant:
3M Company, Network Supply, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company and others
Plaintiff:
Jamie Banks, Candice Banks, Jackie Sexton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Wimbush et al v. Carter et al
as 5:2021cv00154
Plaintiff:
Raymond Lewis Wimbush and Cowboy Dan's Trading Post & Pawn Shop
Defendant:
Detective Carter and Oak Grove Police Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Briggs v. Lewis
as 4:2021cv00102
Petitioner:
Lorenzo Frank Briggs
Respondent:
Mike Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
