Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Tyner v. Graham et al
as 2:2017cv01790
Plaintiff:
Angela Tyner
Defendant:
Chene Graham , Ruth Covington-Leitner , Linda Bradshaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arrowood v. Knowlin et al
as 9:2014cv03155
Plaintiff:
Christopher Boyd Arrowood, Jr
Defendant:
Gregory Knowlin, Kenneth Sharpe, Linda Bradshaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lott v. Bradshaw et al
as 2:2012cv01190
Plaintiff:
Mark Tillman Lott
Defendant:
Linda Bradshaw, Kenneth Sharp and Kevin Coleman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jimmy Meggs, Jr. v. State of South Carolina
as 11-7016
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JIMMY D. MEGGS, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, CECILIA R. REYNOLDS, Warden of Kershaw County Correctional Institution and LINDA BRADSHAW, A W of Turbeville C I
Wilson v. Ozmint et al
as 3:2011cv01035
Plaintiff:
Quantrell Wilson
Defendant:
Ozmint, Kenneth Sharpe, George P Windley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Meggs v. State of South Carolina et al
as 8:2011cv00949
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Donald Meggs, Jr
Defendant:
State of South Carolina, Cecilia Reynolds and Linda Bradshaw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kinard v. Ozmitt et al
as 6:2010cv02745
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Kinard
Defendant:
John Ozmitt, Linda Bradshaw and Ms Cook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael McKnight v. Jon Ozmint et al
as 10-7167
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL MCKNIGHT, a/k/a Michael Tyrell McKnight
Defendant - Appellee:
JON OZMINT, Director SCDC, GREGORY KNOWLIN, Warden, LINDA BRADSHAW, Assoc Warden and others
Wiggs v. Ozmint et al
as 9:2010cv00863
Plaintiff:
Charles Dewey Wiggs, Jr
Defendant:
Jon E Ozmint, Gregory T Knowlin, Richard Rohl and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wiggs v. Ozmint et al
as 1:2010cv00863
Plaintiff:
Charles Dewey Wiggs, Jr
Defendant:
Jon E Ozmint, Gregory T Knowlin, Richard Rohl and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
