Cases 1 - 10 of 228
Lloyd v. Indivior Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65623
Plaintiff:
Eric Lloyd
Defendant:
Indivior Inc., Indivior PLC, Indivior Solutions, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Isham v. Richardson et al
as 3:2024cv00142
Plaintiff:
Ralph E. Isham
Defendant:
Chief Craig Richardson, Sergeant Kenneth Lloyd, Scott Kinderdine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lloyd v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02000
Plaintiff:
Lacey S. Lloyd
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lloyd v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01977
Plaintiff:
Lacey Lloyd
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
NRP Contractors LLC v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London
as 1:2024cv00391
Plaintiff:
NRP Contractors LLC
Defendant:
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635 Breach of Insurance Contract
Blackwell v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01781
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Franklin Blackwell
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Stein v. Austin et al
as 2:2024cv00990
Plaintiff:
Matthew A. Stein
Defendant:
Secretary Lloyd J. Austin, III and Aaron McGuire
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Brown v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01604
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Brown
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lloyd v. Mackey
as 1:2024cv00622
Petitioner:
Cronie Lloyd
Respondent:
Acting Warden Misty Mackey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Eckstein v. Lloyd et al.
as 1:2024cv00514
Plaintiff:
Andrew Eckstein
Defendant:
Inspector Diane Lloyd, Warden Jennifer Black and Lutinent D. Thrasher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
