Cases 1 - 10 of 60
Samcity Express Inc v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of London et al
as 2:2024cv00280
Plaintiff:
SAMCITY EXPRESS, INC
Defendant:
Certain Underwriters at Lloyds of London and ASSUREDPARTNERS OF KANSAS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635 Breach of Insurance Contract
Hopkins v. State of Wisconsin et al
as 2:2023cv01452
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Hopkins
Defendant:
State of Wisconsin and Dane County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01322
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Schuenke v. Jewell
as 2:2023cv00935
Petitioner:
Lloyd T Schuenke
Respondent:
Chantell Jewell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hopkins v. Milwaukee County
as 2:2023cv00868
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Hopkins
Defendant:
Milwaukee County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lloyd v. Kijakazi
as 2:2023cv00663
Plaintiff:
Clifton Lloyd
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Hopkins v. Sinclair et al
as 2:2023cv00482
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Hopkins
Defendant:
Luke P Sinclair, Gregory Haanstad and Samuel Christensen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Hopkins v. United States of America
as 2:2023cv00354
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Hopkins
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Hopkins v. Social Security Administration
as 2:2023cv00218
Petitioner:
Lloyd Hopkins
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Hawthorne v. Lloyd et al
as 2:2023cv00133
Plaintiff:
Royce Lancil Hawthorne and Royce Laneil Hawthorne
Defendant:
Robert Lloyd, Josue Ayala, Alan Beathe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
