Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Wilson v. Arrowood et al
as 2:2024cv11151
Plaintiff:
Michael Wilson
Defendant:
Paul Arrowood and Logan Barber
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Logan v. Corewell Health et al
as 1:2024cv00327
Plaintiff:
Michael Logan
Defendant:
Corewell Health, Trinity Health, Humana Insurance and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Keller v. Kalamazoo Public Schools et al
as 1:2022cv00177
Plaintiff:
Camdyn Keller and Rani Keller
Defendant:
Kalamazoo Public Schools and Larry Logan
Not Classified By Court:
Facilitative Mediator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Brown et al v. Wyoming, City of et al
as 1:2021cv00855
Plaintiff:
Eric Brown, Roy Thorne and S.T. a Minor through his Next Friend Roy Thorne
Defendant:
City of Wyoming, Chief Kimberly Koster, Officer Logan Wieber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sader v. Logan's Roadhouse, Inc.
as 2:2020cv10591
Plaintiff:
Hussein Sader
Defendant:
Logan's Roadhouse, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Martinez v. Faurecia Automotive Seating, LLC et al
as 2:2019cv12351
Defendant:
Anna Rossi, Debbie Clephane, Faurecia Automotive Seating, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Christian Yamin Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Fayad v. McMahon et al
as 2:2018cv13982
Plaintiff:
Ray Ahmed Fayad
Defendant:
Ronald Dupuis, Michael Moore, Hamtramck, City of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv13808
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Baker v. Rogers et al
as 4:2018cv11234
Plaintiff:
Emerald M. Baker
Defendant:
Chantel Rogers, Wanda Woods, Brian Popour and others
Petrou et al v. The Bank of Ann Arbor et al
as 2:2017cv14201
Plaintiff:
Myria Petrou and Bradley Foerster
Defendant:
The Bank of Ann Arbor , Mary Hays , Carl Ent and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
