Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Lomax v. Longmont United Hospital, et al
as 24-1032
Petitioner:
MATTHEW S. LOMAX, Regional Director of Region 27 of the National Labor Relations Board, for and on behalf of the National Labor Relations Board
Respondent:
LONGMONT UNITED HOSPITAL and CENTURA HEALTH, as a single employer
Lomax v. Longmont United Hospital, et al
as 24-1014
Petitioner:
MATTHEW S. LOMAX, Regional Director of Region 27 of the National Labor Relations Board, for and on behalf of the National Labor Relations Board
Respondent:
LONGMONT UNITED HOSPITAL and CENTURA HEALTH, as a single employer
Lomax v. Longmont United Hospital et al
as 1:2023cv02297
Petitioner:
Regional Director Matthew S. Lomax and Matthew S. Lomax
Respondent:
Longmont United Hospital and Centura Health
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0160 j - Labor: Petition for Inj. -- Relief From Unfair Labor Practice
v. Lomax et al
as 1:2023cv02296
Defendant:
Matthew S. Lomax and Longmont United Hospital
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 015
NLRB v. Longmont United Hospital
as 22-1285
Petitioner:
National Labor Relations Board
Respondent:
Longmont United Hospital
Longmont United Hospital v. NLRB
as 22-1262
Petitioner:
Longmont United Hospital
Respondent:
National Labor Relations Board
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01567
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01566
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Tucson Medical Center et al v. Xavier Becerra
as 2:2022cv00989
Plaintiff:
Tucson Medical Center, Alton Memorial Hospital, Abbeville General Hospital and others
Petitioner:
Bethesda Memorial Hospital
Defendant:
Xavier Becerra
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Colwell et al v. Longmont United Hospital
as 1:2021cv03137
Plaintiff:
Catherine Colwell and Leola Boone
Defendant:
Longmont United Hospital
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
