Cases 1 - 10 of 15
(PS) Caldwell v. Barr et al
as 2:2019cv01357
Plaintiff:
Leah S. Cladwell and Leah S. Caldwell
Defendant:
Bejamin Civiletti, Richard L. Thornburgh, Alberto R. Gonzales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tara McCluskey El v. James G. Perry et al
as 2:2018cv09884
Defendant:
Jackie Lacey, Office of The Attorney General, The Los Angeles District Attorney and others
Plaintiff:
Tara McCluskey El
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Tara McCluskey El v. James G. Perry et al
as 2:2017cv00426
Defendant:
Attorney General United States Department of the White House, Does, Jackie Lacey and others
Plaintiff:
Tara McCluskey El
Busso-Estopellan v. United States of America et al
as 2:2017cv00120
Plaintiff:
Jesus Antonio Busso-Estopellan
Defendant:
United States of America, Loretta Lynch and David Harlow
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Sargsyan v. Lynch et al
as 3:2016cv02070
Defendant:
Does, Jeh Johnson, Loretta Lynch and others
Plaintiff:
Marianna Sargsyan
Cause Of Action: 5 U.S.C. § 706 Administrative Procedures Act(Judicial Review)
Seavon Pierce et al v. John E. McDermott
as 2:2016cv07554
Plaintiff:
A.C.L.U., Human Rights Watch, L.A. Times Newspaper and others
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigations, Federal Judicial Commission, Julie L. Garland and others
Emerald v. Lynch
as 1:2016at00762
Petitioner:
Keith Matthew Emerald
Defendant:
Loretta Lynch
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Emerald v. Lynch
as 1:2016mc00050
Petitioner:
Keith Matthew Emerald
Defendant:
Loretta Lynch
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Mohamed Al Seraji v. Peter Neffenger et al
as 8:2016cv01637
Plaintiff:
Mohamed Al Seraji
Defendant:
James Comey, Jeh Johnson, Loretta Lynch and others
Saevon Pierce v. John E. McDermott et al
as 2:2016cv05393
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigations, Federal Judicial Commission, Julie L. Garland and others
Plaintiff:
Seavon Pierce
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
