Cases 81 - 90 of 324
Matthew Clark v. Attorney General Pennsylvania, et al
as 13-2021
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MATTHEW CLARK
Defendant - Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA, LOUIS FOLINO and DISTRICT ATTORNEY WASHINGTON COUNTY
Damien Mikell v. Louis Folino
as 13-1997
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAMIEN MIKELL
Defendant - Appellee:
LOUIS FOLINO, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
ELLIOTT v. FOLINO et al
as 2:2013cv01944
Petitioner:
NASIR ELLIOTT
Respondent:
LOUIS FOLINO and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Keith Anderson v. Bowman, et al
as 13-1844
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEITH ANDERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
LOUIS FOLINO, MICHELE L. HOWARD-DIGGS, WALTERS and others
Defendant - Numerous Parties See Appellee:
NELSON
In re: Nelson Birdwell
as 13-1794
Petitioner:
In re: NELSON BIRDWELL
Respondent:
LOUIS FOLINO, DISTRICT ATTORNEY LEHIGH COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
In re: Dale Peter
as 13-1791
Petitioner:
In re: DALE R. PETERS
Respondent:
LOUIS FOLINO, DISTRICT ATTORNEY LANCASTER COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
STONE v. FOLINO et al
as 2:2013cv00401
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER M. STONE
Defendant:
LOUIS FOLINO and LORINDA WINFIELD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
In re: Eddie Luckett, Jr.
as 13-1743
Petitioner:
In re: EDDIE L. LUCKETT, JR.
Respondent:
LOUIS FOLINO
Richard Heary v. Louis Folino, et al
as 13-1579
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD HEARY
Defendant - Appellee:
LOUIS FOLINO, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Jesse Bond v. David Horne, et al
as 13-1379
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JESSE BOND
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID HORNE, Corrections Office (C.O.) State Correctional Institution ar Greene (SCI-Greene), Waynesburg, Pennsylvania (PA), JAMES LIPSCOMB, Lieutenant, JENKINS, First Name Unknown (FNU), Sergeant SCI-Greene, Waynesburg, PA and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
